NUCLEAR ISSUES

In March 2011, the Dai-Ichi power plant at Fukushima experienced a double first in human history, not just a China syndrome but a triple China syndrome. The cores of three reactors melted through the steel and concrete containment and are now somewhere in the earth’s crust. What the reaction will be is a complete unknown but it would appear that Nature – as always – has it firmly under control.

The Chernobyl accident was more or less contained thanks to the rapid reaction of the Russian head of state and the sacrifice of a couple of thousand people. The only comparison with Fukushima is that there is a serious problem, because the latter is ongoing, releasing radiation into the air and water

The focus of this topic is radiation, rather irradiation. If ever humanity survives beyond the 21st century and looks back to this epoch, it risks being epitomized as a period of very unfriendly radiation.

Derision is a common construct in the manipulation of a “belief system”, systematically employed by the majority of modern opponents. It is a rather weak form of humour and one does not generally turn to industrialists, let alone scientists, for humour, so it is especially distressing to find that they take the Mickey out of the general public who vainly searches for some truth in the mass of deliberately decentralized and dissembled data. But, as they say in the armed forces: “If you can’t take a joke, you shouldn’t have joined!”

The first time I encountered this cynicism on the part of industry was in the 1980s when working for the French nationalized electricity utility which had just sold what became the Daya Bay nuclear power plant to China. All the technical specifications, operating manuals and training documentation had to be translated into English from French and the Chinese engineers and technicians took it from there. For some reason the French legislation concerning irradiation was even included in one of the files that ended up on my desk to be translated and so it was that I learned that emission of beta radiation is against the law, therefore not allowed, in France.

Because something is not allowed by law, it does not happen. All quite logical so far!

So, even if a power plant does emit beta radiation when venting or as a result of an accident or incident, it cannot admit to emitting beta radiation as it is illegal! But if no mention is made of beta radiation on the compulsory declaration documents, because it is not an option, the problem is solved!

We are living in interesting times as far as nuclear irradiation is concerned. No one questions why Japan – a country that is only allowed an army for internal purposes – is “authorized” to produce material for nuclear weapons, thanks to the use of mixed oxide fuel in their nuclear reactors. Disregarding the geo-politics of which we know but what we can glean, there is a stone-cold and very hard fact: the cocktail of isotopes coming from the Fukushima Dai-ichi plutonium and uranium fuel rods is daunting, primarily because of its longevity of effect, its interference in the hydrological and carbon cycle, and more especially, its impact on the hydrogen bonds which apparently keep us humans all together.

But the cat is now out of the bag! Thirteen years of CONSTANT release of radioactive effluents into the atmosphere and sea from THREE nuclear units. A triple “China syndrome” plus a stack of highly volatile used fuel rods make for the worst-ever nuclear issue and there is no solution to stop the meltdown. So, what to do?

The international media, the world’s nuclear watchdogs, governments, politicians are all silent. What an extraordinary demonstration of leadership! Not one person steps forward. At least we have been spared the derision – so far. Of course, there is cynicism with a proposed restart of the nuclear power plants in Japan, albeit not in Fukushima, in addition to the prohibition to speak of a problem in the press.

Clearly there is nothing to be expected from these “authorities”. So, let’s take a step back in history and then move forward to a possible solution. The only person in the world to have conducted an experiment with the intention of finding an antidote against nuclear radiation sickness was Wilhelm Reich in December 1950. The Oranur experiment did not reach its goal but a number of immensely useful facts were discovered. In his words “It was found, beyond any reasonable doubt, that so-called radiation sickness is not, as heretofore assumed, a direct result of nuclear energy radiation upon living tissue but an immediate expression of a severe reaction of organismic energy against the action of nuclear energy radiation.”

The all-important “detail” Reich could be said to have overlooked was the fact that there were fifteen or so orgone accumulators in his laboratory when the uranium isotope was introduced into the premises! They were the reason such a strong reaction was triggered and led to the above conclusion and his subsequent internment and death in an American Federal Penitentiary in 1957.

Ever since Fukushima blew on 11 March 2011, I got busy building one, two, three then four orgone accumulators, including a portable one!

If there was such a thing as an individual dosimeter which could be applied on a person, then placed in a clean environment – free of any atmospheric radiation, to be then applied again on that same person after a twenty-minute stay in an orgone accumulator so as to have a fresh reading without any external influence, I would try to obtain one. But a Geiger counter has to be calibrated and the way the world is being inundated by alpha radiation (beta too, and gamma in Japan) it would be impossible, outside of a clean room, to do that without picking up background radiation, so falsifying the whole operation.

Not sure of the validity of a dosimeter I use a pendulum to ask, on a scale of 0-10 what the rate of nuclear irradiation is in a person. Once again, after a 20-minute session in the accumulator, I ask again and invariably that reading is 0. The only drawback is the need to sit in the accumulator every two-to-three weeks. That stuff keeps coming back!

By the way, Reich was jailed for contempt of court and he died there.

CELL PHONES

A cell-phone is essentially a radio sending and receiving signals on waves to and from a base station, often at some distance. To cover that distance, the signal is pushed by a burst of electric power which is a source of radiation causing some concern to humans and the environment. The further the base station, the more power needed to carry the signal; the more power, the more radiation generated, and the greater the unknown effect. Thus, the power bars on your phone give you an indication of how much radiation you are being exposed to during a call: the fewer number of bars, the greater amount of radiation.

Something we are inclined to forget is that humans also generate their own EMR (electromagnetic radiation), albeit very low. The effect of external EMR on humans varies substantially, depending on a host of factors including the individual’s current and past state of physical, mental and nervous health, the environment, plus other facets that are still unknown and probably not being investigated.

The effects of EM radiation are in all probability cumulative as regards the human metabolism. As a result, it is nigh but impossible to point a finger and categorically say the fault lies with one rather than another cause. There are, however, at least five differentiated effects of specific mechanisms in cell-phone technology which have been identified that could potentially be harmful to humans:

The differentiated effects

1/ One of these effects, the ELF (Extremely Low Frequency), is to be found in the extremely low-frequency EM field, e.g. a utility or mains power line (±50 Hz). The magnetic field is predominant in this section of the EM spectrum (in an EM field, there is always a magnetic field with an electric field perpendicular to it, with the magnetic field producing an electric field and the electric field producing a magnetic field, reciprocally self-propagating). When an ELF field is pulsed by high power, there is a direct magnetic impact on the physiology of cells and tissues, one such effect may be disruption of cellular gap junctional communication. Surrounded by so many magnetic fields, we human beings have probably developed compensatory mechanisms forming a protective threshold, so we can sustain a certain degree of magnetic field intensity without adverse effect, until such time as the power pushing that magnetic field is too strong, as might happen underneath a power line.

2/ At the high end of the spectrum, we have the ionising radiation window, where the electric field is predominant due to extremely high energy levels. The EM waves in the ionising range abound in nature, coming from sunlight, lightning and other natural sources. They are capable of breaking apart chemical bonds, thus causing severe damage, and once again, at least in terms of clinical manifestations, there seems to be a threshold or a safe level albeit very dependent on the individual’s condition.

3/ In between these spectral extremes, you have the radio frequency radiation window. To put this in perspective, let’s look at a microwave signal in a cell-phone oscillating at 1,900 megahertz (1,900 million cycles per second), whereas the human heart beats at two hertz, two cycles per second. That means the microwave signal is pulsing too fast for your body to pick up, it simply does not recognize it.

4/ The only time your body will recognize it is if you put 100 watts of power behind that signal and then you can heat tissue and flesh as you would in a microwave oven. So, when you put high power behind a microwave, you cause heating and that is the thermal effect that current western government standards and industry-backed research alone address, to the exclusion of the other four, which makes it facile to state that science is doing what it can in its efforts to protect the general public. Scientific research is paid for by vested interest. Imagine what happens when a technology slips past the attention of the watchdog, is making serious money and the safety standards are being made up along the way.

5/ Matters now become a little more complicated. To achieve wireless communication, as in cell-phone technology, data must not only be carried but deciphered if we want the other party at the other end to hear us talking. For that to happen, the information has to be packaged and it is bundled in packets based on amplitude modulation. To do this and allow room for new calls, you have breaks in the modulation, either code domain breaks or time domain breaks. The result is that packets of data move and then stop, then move again and stop, so allowing multiple access on the same frequency band. Such action forms a secondary wave. This information-carrying radio wave formed by the packeting of information oscillates in the hertz range and in the hertz range, the body can recognize it.

What happens physically? We cannot be sure, but one scenario goes as follows: At the level of cell membrane, whether it is a brain cell, a blood cell, a nerve cell, a liver cell, a bone cell or a skin cell, there are protein receptors on the cell membrane and their function is to keep track of what is going on in the environment around the cell. Human cells have chemical and vibrational receptors. The vibrational receptors are able to pick up radio signals that oscillate in the hertz to kilohertz range. As the information-carrying radio wave comes in the vicinity of the cell, the vibrational protein recognizes it within milliseconds. Because this information-carrying radio wave is not a natural phenomena, the body might interpret it as an invader, sending a message to the cell that causes a protective reaction.

What will happen if the active transport channels, through which nutrients pass into the cell and waste products pass out, close down? If nutrients cannot access the cell, the cell might become nutrient and energy deficient and when a cell becomes energy deficient, it is unable to communicate with surrounding cells, so you risk a break in intercellular communication, causing a fundamental disruption in the physiological process. When waste product builds up inside the cell, you can have a very high concentration of highly reactive molecules called free radicals. Free radicals tend to go to the mitochondria, where all of the respiratory functioning of the cell takes place and might disrupt its functioning, thus creating cellular dysfunction. So, for example, if you have a cell whose job is keeping the blood-brain barrier closed and that cell is now dysfunctional, the blood-brain barrier may open. Under normal circumstances, the immune system would handle all of this but the problem is if intercellular communication has been disrupted and the message to the immune system does not get there, you could end up with a micronucleus or a piece of wild DNA sitting in a nutrient-rich environment, free to clone and proliferate. That could be the mechanism for the development of all sorts of problems.

The potential health dangers from a microwave signal, therefore, are not from direct damage, but rather due to the biochemical responses in the cell about which we are learning (or not) more day by day.

SOME BACKGROUND

In 1993, the US Congress held open hearings and it became clear that cell-phones had been exempted from premarket testing.

Normally, any consumer device emitting radiation, such as a mobile phone or cell-phone, would go through a process of pre-market launch testing that would include a series of in vitro and in vivo studies to evaluate predictions of risk to the population that would use them. Cell-phones, however, were exempted from that testing for one reason or another at the time of their launch in 1984.

No results from in vivo tests have ever been released to the public – if they were ever conducted.

The scientific argument of the day was based on the belief that the only health effect that could follow from using such a device was due to the microwave heating of biological tissue. And because cell-phones operated at very, very low power, they would not be able to heat tissue. They were, therefore, excluded from the onerous process of pre-market testing.

That exemption was known as the “low power exclusion, and in retrospect, that one political mistake has put millions of people at risk of serious disease” says George Carlo. Following the public hearing in 1992, Congress took issue with both the Food and Drug Administration, which was the agency of record responsible for these radiation emitting devices, as well as with the mobile phone industry itself.

In the USA it is the FDA (Food & Drug Administration) which “governs” the issue, although one might reasonably wonder what a phone has to do with food and drugs, rather than the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) which has, or rather had, a reputation for being tougher to deal with and more careful of the environment.

Congress put both on the spot and the mobile phone industry immediately agreed to put up what became $28.5 million dollars in research funding as long as the FDA did not ban mobile phones at the time. Dr. George Carlo (the man who cleared the name of dioxin, “agent orange”) was the person given the responsibility of overseeing and conducting that research under the umbrella organization, Wireless Technology Research, unfortunately according to Microwave News, it all turned out to be a monumental scam.

Between 1993 and 1999, with more than 200 doctors and scientists from around the world participating, and the Harvard School of Public Health reviewing more than 56 studies, they ran what still remains the largest programme ever conducted in the world on the dangers of mobile telephony and wireless communications in general. To no avail.

This limbo situation persists despite the standards, in theory applied to protect humanity at large, adopted by the World Health Organisation, the US Environmental Protection Agency and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection.

According to Dr. Vladimir N. Binhi, theoretical physicist and head of the Radiobiology Laboratory at the General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow, these standards are irrelevant. In February 2003 he stated, “U.S. standards and those proposed by WHO are 100 times more lenient, depending on frequency range, than the Russian standards, which are based on the observed biological effects of chronic EM (electro-magnetic) exposures.”

At the session on September 19, 2001, the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (RNCNIRP) discussed and for the first time approved the recommendations for the population and organizations of the cellular communications industry:

1. Supporting the Precautionary Principle of the World Health Organization, relying on the published data of foreign studies, scientific generalizations, opinions of the international scientific organizations, and expert opinions of members of the RNCNIRP, to distribute on behalf of the RNCNIRP the following information for the population about the key safety and hygienic rules regarding use of cell-phones:

1.1. Non-use of cell-phones by children under the age of 16.

1.2. Non-use of cell-phones by pregnant women.

1.3. Non-use of cell-phones by persons suffering from neurological conditions or diseases, including neurasthenia or dysthymic disorders, mental disorders, neuroses, intellectual and memory impairment, sleep disorders, epilepsy, and epileptic predisposition.

1.4. Limiting the duration of phone calls to a maximum of three minutes, and allowing a period between calls of a minimum of 15 minutes. Preferred use of headsets and hands-free systems.

2. The cell-phone manufacturers and retailers should include the following information to accompany engineering specifications:

2.1. All of the above recommendations regarding use.

2.2. Data and conclusions on relevant health and epidemiological testing on cell-phones, measured EMFs, and the name of the test lab.

Here, the dialogue on the subject of mobile telephony basically breaks down, and naturally enough, the position of the industry is clear and unlikely to change, to make money they must have many people talking on one frequency band at the same time.

All this to say that some things cannot be substantiated or refuted by science, for a very simple reason, scientists are human – physical – and it would be strange for a material product of our world of evolving energy to be able to point to its own cause, which is of an energetic or spiritual nature. We are such an intricate part of the whole that we are physically unable to adopt an objective stance. So, mobile phones sell well and the number of EM radiation-related disorders afflicting humans and the environment continue to rise. Are the two related?

Thirty-odd years after their introduction to the market in 1984, more than 30 industry-sponsored studies have indicated that cell-phones present no risk of brain cancer. The latest (2011) released WHO analysis, after a decade-long study monitoring almost 13,000 mobile phone users, confirms otherwise. The WHO states that cell-phone use and brain cancer are related and that “heavy” (half an hour daily!) cell-phone use increases the risk of developing cancerous tumours in the brain. So, that apparently indicates there is a brain tumour problem, but what about other health upsets?

Penetration rates for the cell-phone market in the USA are greater than 75%, and in Hong Kong, Japan and western Europe, penetration has already exceeded 100% (multiple cell-phones per subscriber). Seventy-five percent of the 7 billion plus cell-phones currently in use worldwide are in developing countries and, within the next decade, there will be more cell-phone subscriptions in the world than people.

Life, being part and parcel of matter, can be viewed as a series of dynamic patterns. The wonders of modern technology are further additions to this series of patterns. Given that the influences of energy fields are instantaneous and local, their extent in space depends on their emitting force and the resistance of outside counteracting forces.

MORE ON CELL PHONES

Food for thought

Why did Italy’s Supreme Court in the recent past uphold a compensation claim that a brain tumour was caused by mobile phone use? (incidentally setting a precedent that could ruin the insurance industry).

Why does Didier Bellens, head of Belgium’s largest telecom company ban wifi in the office where his managers work, citing that “the waves are dangerous”?

Why has the American Academy of Pediatricians endorsed the Cell Phone Safety Legislation, to provide warning labels on mobiles, regarding women and children especially at risk to mobile radiation?

Is the European Environment Agency’s latest report proposing “All reasonable measures to reduce EM exposure, especially for children” and “Reconsider the scientific basis of present EMF exposure standards” as well as calling to provide effective labelling about potential risks, merely a hoax?

Maybe, India rejecting the archaic ICNIRP heating limits, instead, setting them 1/10th of the limit is just a random figure arrived at by accident.

One legitimately wonders why Brussels, the seat of the European Union, the HQ of NATO and host to numerous corporate head offices, decided not to allow 5G.

Incidentally, the Russians have been enjoying the luxury of much stricter EMF safety limits since the 50’s.

Perhaps the grants you can get in certain parts of Sweden to install EMF shielding is because they like the silvery effect of the wallpaper.

The advice of the Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly: resolution 1815(2011) to create “wave-free areas” recommends that the member states of the Council of Europe, in general terms, take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones and particularly the exposure to children and young people who seem to be most at risk from head tumours; pay particular attention to “electrosensitive” people who suffer from a syndrome of intolerance to electromagnetic fields and introduce special measures to protect them, including creation of wave-free areas not covered by the wireless network.

Answers to all these questions would require properly funded and independent research, but governments are not prepared to do this, so we may justifiably ask not only if EMFs are completely safe, but if there is more to all this than meets our unseeing eyes.

The presumed effects on the environment

Environmental studies have been numerous and from around the world, but no conclusions have ever been formally drawn. I would maintain that due to our faulty understanding of how Nature works – as a comprehensive, wholistic unit, a wedge can be easily inserted. Science works on the principle of differentiation or compartmentalization, and it is probably the only way it can operate but it is definitely not the way of Nature.

In the 1990’s a radar specialist examining data from studies made on the effects of the VHF radar station at Skrunda in Latvia, found that the growth rings of trees were reduced during the period in which the station was operational and the pine needles made more resin (an indication of cellular stress perhaps?). A parallel study on the performance of local schoolchildren in tests was significantly reduced in the main beam of the station compared with those in relative safety behind the antenna.

In my experience as an observer of nature for most of my life, especially in a period of eleven years in Chiang Mai, I have witnessed the disappearance of wildlife species (nightjars, drongos, swallows, frogs, bats, etc.), increasingly strange behaviour of nature (double blooming of tamarind fruit in a six-month period, diseased bark and growth on trees, bats flying during the day and sandpipers active at night all year round), and a deterioration of the natural environment (fungal diseases, and so on).

I am convinced that if things are taken out of context, if we differentiate, we get lost in the detail and lose the thread. One only has to read the in-depth studies produced by eminent specialists to realise that our understanding of proteins – the source of life for plants, animals and humans, is so incomplete that we are not even able to appreciate the cycle of activity that allows life. There is no need to establish the relationship of cryptochrome with the eye or with magnetite, only to discover after years of work that we cannot find out that what really matters is the impact we humans are having on nature, because you cannot find the funding for research if vested interests are involved. Nature takes second place and that includes humans.

Current funding

Research funding comes from:

a/ legislators who decide how to spend the tax-payer’s money,

b/ industry in an attempt to consolidate their market position and

c/ a tiny amount from private sources.

Increasingly less money is allocated to research into anything to do with mobile telephony for the simple reason that fewer and fewer governments are prepared to take on the best-selling product of the last few years. There has been a trend ever since the Reagan-era in the US when industry started their efforts at influencing the agencies set up to protect the public and the environment. As for example under Anne Burford, the head of the EPA in 1981, virtually all her subordinates were from the industries the agency was charged with overseeing! That was the time when Hayes, head of the FDA, approved aspartame as a sweetener, following years of lobbying by Donald Rumsfeld on behalf of Searle. Business was booming!

Answers to all the questions that arise would require properly funded and independent research, but governments (if they wish to retain that function) are not prepared to do this, so we may justifiably ask if EMFs, as they are currently manipulated, are safe.

5G

5G requires the use of three frequency ranges: a coverage layer, about 700 MHz; the primary carrier band ranging between 3.4-3.8 GHz; and, a super data layer around 25 GHz. This last layer has now been extended upto 60 GHz. The current system (4G) operates on a range generally around 1,700 MHz.
Stuff happens to radiation as it travels: it can bounce or scatter, it can pass through and transmit, or it can be absorbed and stop. Intensity of radiation also depends on several factors, such as wavelength, the force with which it strikes the barrier, the chemical makeup of what’s hit, the physical structure and the thickness of that barrier. It may appear to be a complicated business, and that complexity is used to conceal the downsides. Every effort is made to conceal from the general public what it is doing to nature at large, for one very simple reason – governments, telecom operators and the affiliated industry (including the guys who chop down the trees because they form a barrier that stops you learning what your neighbour had for lunch) – want to make money NO MATTER HOW.

By what right does a government decide how our air is to be used? To conceal knowingly the problems that were discovered during the development of radar in the 1930s, and to pretend that the not-so-hard-to-prove evidence that the microwave component of a mobile phone heats your head?

For example, the US govt. made 45 billion USD in February 2017 selling air-space for, I believe, a period of four years (when the same band will come up for auction again). Did the public see any of that cash? Definitely not, but, one thing is sure, they are now paying the successful-bid operator not only to use those air-waves, but are probably witness to rising levels of tinnitus, electro-sensitivity and discomfort. 

SOLUTIONS

But, and here is the good news, we can do something apart from not using cell-phones, although that would surely be the best solution as there is strong evidence that the environment is gradually becoming saturated with the baneful waves in the form of “electrosmog”.

There appears to be a major difference of opinion regarding naturally occurring and man-made energy fields. Whether we shall ever know the truth is debatable, because in the very same domain of phone neutralizers/shields one can read diametrically opposing opinions, namely, some say that in nature, fields of energy are random in their form, frequency and amplitude, and the human body can apparently handle these irregular flows of emanations or waves without any problem, as our cells do exactly the same thing, i.e. emit and receive random energy forms day in and day out; whereas man-made energy fields are of a regular and constant pattern. This regularity does not harmonize with nature’s random manner and apparently creates resistance. Others say the contrary. Fundamentally, it matters little what the theory is, because what we do find is that, at some stage, problems happen.

There are numerous claims out there, including mine! But it requires a strong stretch of the imagination to claim in all seriousness that a crystal, a rare earth (including shungite), combinations of metals or homeopathics can offset, let alone ‘neutralize’, the impact of a frequency for any length of time.

Without exception, and I say this on the strength of kinesiological-testing and (don’t laugh!) answers using a pendulum, the molecular structure of all of the above are modified by frequential radiation. It is simply a matter of time, and the crystal can not tell you that it is saturated and no longer fulfilling its intended purpose. Some retailers are honest enough to inform you of this, and offer to cleanse, recharge and return the device after a year’s use.

After several years research to develop a device that avoids saturation, achieves the object of pain-relief (hot ear, headache, blood cell agglomeration), the solution I came up with to offset the harm caused by cell-phone technologies is a purely individual one, inasmuch as the device operates on the individual rather than the environment. This is a geometric form-based invention which goes by the name of the Freeland Double Vortex or FDV.

Nature doesn’t do straight lines, whereas radio transmission functions on a linear principle and can be very harsh in the process. So, taking a leaf from Nature’s page, I used a carefully researched spiral designed on the Fibonacci series. Initially, using specific length and selected materials, the results were conclusive – no more hot ear or headache. Finally, using a printed spiral on paper (four of them plus projectors), the effect was accomplished.

Red-cell blood tests (Rouleau and erythrocyte) revealed a substantial difference in the bio-magnetic behaviour of persons using the FDV, and those not using it. Maybe it was the porridge they ate for breakfast, I hear you say. I can only reply, maybe.

Remember, science got us into this mess, now we have to rely on ourselves to find a way out.

[et_pb_section][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text]

Realaxation

The only ℞ you’ll ever need! created by Leon Eeman and revisited by Christopher Freeland

We often hear people saying “Just relax!” Quite right! Of course you know that you should relax, but has anyone ever told you how to do so, or why? Probably not!

This Realaxation® system is the result of many years of research into suffering of all kinds, physical, metaphysical, mental, spiritual and things (fortunately) forgotten, conducted by a number of people, foremost of whom is L.E.Eeman. Incredibly simple, so extremely difficult, it can be understood in five minutes with a demonstration of three very straightforward postures, but requires a few hours practice. The greatest benefit is gained if used regularly, one session requiring only three minutes, preferably morning and evening.

A brief reminder of how modern medicine believes we operate physiologically might help elaborate the purpose of Realaxation®. For the sake of simplicity, the human nervous system consists of:

The voluntary system, primarily concerned with movement and sensation, and

The involuntary or autonomic system, mainly controlling functions over which we have less conscious control, such as digestion of food, blood pressure and heart rate, etc. The latter system has two branches: the sympathetic and the parasympathetic.

The Sympathetic Branch activates the glands and organs that defend the body against attack (the fight or flight system). Its nerves direct more blood to the muscles and the brain, causing the heart rate and blood pressure to increase, while decreasing the blood flow to the digestive tract organs. It also activates the thyroid and adrenal glands to provide extra energy for fighting or running away. Nervousness, stress or feelings of panic are what one feels when in a sympathetic state of readiness. The sympathetic system is catabolic – it breaks down molecules to release energy to prepare for defence. After the initial rush a feeling of fatigue sets in, as this system uses up energy and depletes the body.

The Parasympathetic Branch is concerned with nourishing, healing, elimination and regeneration. It is anabolic, it stimulates digestion, as well as the immune system and eliminative organs – liver, spleen, stomach and intestines. The parasympathetic nervous system, activated by rest, relaxation and happy thoughts, is essential for balanced living and for all healing. Moving yourself into a healthy parasympathetic state, and staying there as much of the time as possible, helps heal all conditions, whether physical, mental, nervous or emotional. The feeling often associated with the parasympathetic state is one of lethargy or fatigue, because you are so relaxed. It is not unhealthy, on the contrary, it indicates a state of repair and rebuilding in progress.

The sympathetic powerfully inhibits the parasympathetic. This is, of course, a survival mechanism because the emergency system, the sympathetic, takes precedence over relaxation and healing, and one system or the other is activated almost all of the time. There is just one nervous system and the individual functions as a whole. The idea that the two divisions oppose each other is a misleading simplification because neither division is ever activated in its entirety. Rather, each division consists of a series of discrete functional pathways that may be activated from the central nervous system either independently or in patterns, according to the particular requirement of the particular daily activity that is contributing to bodily homeostasis. Different emergency states require different patterns of activity, and normal daily life (apart from emergencies) also requires patterned autonomic activity.

The aim, to ensure balance and healing, must be to keep the sympathetic system “turned off” as much as possible and the simplest way to do this is to rest, relax and think calming thoughts. As soon as you think fearful or angry thoughts, or become too physically active, the body shifts into a sympathetic stance which is what the majority of people know because they favour the sympathetic branch over the parasympathetic. When the two systems are working as they should, the tendency is to rest often and easily. One can, however, perform at “top speed” with equal ease. When challenged by stress, the balanced person is able to respond with vigour and fortitude.

The parasympathetic system reduces activity of the brain, the muscles, and the adrenal and thyroid glands. When no situation is pressing, the balanced person can comfortably choose to rest and can go to sleep easily and deeply. Excessive use of the sympathetic system inhibits rest and sleep. Most people overuse their sympathetic nervous system and do not spend enough time in the parasympathetic state to rebuild their bodies fully. The causes for sympathetic dominance include: too much work or stress (including geopathic stress), living in fear, anger or resentment. Once in the habit of sympathetic dominance, a vicious cycle can develop. You become used to being tired, so that if, by chance, you rest a lot one day, you use up the energy the next day, instead of continuing to rest, not allowing the body to use the energy accumulated for healing and rebuilding and as a result, depletion and imbalance set in.

WHAT YOU CAN DO

There is much you can do to keep the autonomic system functioning well.

Recharge the body’s magnetic field – Stretch – Breathe correctly – Drink alkaline water – Rest often.

Try to sleep at least 8 hours or more each night. The hours before midnight are by far the best for recuperation. Avoid excessive activity of any kind or getting exhausted by any activity you engage in, including exercise. Do not exercise to “run away” from stress, exercise is a powerful sympathetic stimulant. More rest is often what is really required.

Breathe correctly. Not just at your yoga class, but all the time. Breathing is little understood, like relaxing, except there is a problem if someone has to tell you to breathe! Deep breathing turns the sympathetic system off – so to speak. Breathing is of substantial help for the emotional and mental outlook, but by permanently keeping a positive and harmonious attitude, there is great benefit to be had. There are many reasons to feel gratitude, forgiveness, compassion and joy, not least, they all lead to peace of mind and harmony. By allowing more room on your horizon to these positive emotions, there is little space for disruptive, negative thought.

Eat and drink well. Enough has been written about that elsewhere but perhaps not enough emphasis has been placed on drinking energized alkaline water. As someone said, we die of acid, so why not delay that a while and drink water with a higher pH. One thing worth mentioning when speaking of eating is that the sign of a full stomach is belching, STOP eating instantly when that happens, otherwise there is overload, undigested food and overwork for the entire metabolism, i.e. more stress.

Reduce stress levels as much as possible. Stress is a major stimulant to the sympathetic nervous system. Stress within the body is generally due to fatigue, muscle tension, spinal misalignment or nutritional deficiencies, amongst others. It also comes from outside e.g. financial, work or family stress. Geopathic stress – energies flowing up from the ground combined with those on the surface – albeit unseen, is recognized as being the cause of numerous forms of problems, best check your sleeping/working area.

If you are content with what you have as your lot in life, a host of unpleasant emotions and feelings are replaced, so allowing the sympathetic system to rest.

CONCLUSION

Realaxation®

Physical harmony can be much enhanced by relaxation, here is a guide how to relax, if you could manage this, it will not do you any harm, you never know, it might even do you some good!

Stretching before rest is necessary to achieve subjective efficiency on the mechanical plane during sleep, it is also a good start to the day. The following is a simple routine which can take just a few minutes after a little practice:

1. Lie on the back, both arms loosely extended in the form of a cross, concentrate on the feeling of relaxation in the whole body, then stretch both thumbs as far as possible in the alignment of the arm, keeping the arms straight and on the floor, make sure, by careful attention, that all the muscles connected with the thumb, from the shoulder down, are stretched to the utmost possible length. Follow the same procedure with each of the four fingers separately in both hands jointly, and with all the muscles connected to them, all the way from the shoulders down to the finger tips, and from finger tips to finger tips. Let go, release all the muscular tension of the stretch. Start again, reaching out but without raising the arms or hands off the ground, stretch from the head to the toes, in the same way trying to find the connection all the way through the body, feel yourself grow. And release, allowing the entire body to flop, making sure that there is no tension. If a certain area is tight, let’s say the wrist is causing you concern, focus on the sensation of flow and apply it to the wrist, creating a connection between the muscles of the forearm and the fingers, stretch them to their limit and let go! Concentrate on the sensation of relaxation, no tension, no effort, just a sinking into the floor.

• Lie on the back, both arms loosely extended in the form of a cross, concentrate on the feeling of relaxation in the whole body, then stretch both thumbs as far as possible in the alignment of the arm, keeping the arms straight and on the floor, make sure, by careful attention, that all the muscles connected with the thumb, from the shoulder down, are stretched to the utmost possible length. Follow the same procedure with each of the four fingers separately in both hands jointly, and with all the muscles connected to them, all the way from the shoulders down to the finger tips, and from finger tips to finger tips. Let go, release all the muscular tension of the stretch. Start again, reaching out but without raising the arms or hands off the ground, stretch from the head to the toes, in the same way trying to find the connection all the way through the body, feel yourself grow. And release, allowing the entire body to flop, making sure that there is no tension. If a certain area is tight, let’s say the wrist is causing you concern, focus on the sensation of flow and apply it to the wrist, creating a connection between the muscles of the forearm and the fingers, stretch them to their limit and let go! Concentrate on the sensation of relaxation, no tension, no effort, just a sinking into the floor.A final comprehensive stretch of all four limbs and the head all together and again, release. Initially, spend a few minutes on each stage to become familiar with the tension-release idea until it becomes a natural reaction. If you are not applying the muscles, why waste energy?
• Still on the back, raise the chest, abdomen and hips so as to form an arch supported by the shoulders and buttocks, eventually extend the arch to the heels after some practice. Accentuate the arch, piecemeal. Start at the shoulders and concentrate in succession on the stretching of the muscles of the chest, pit of the stomach, abdominal wall, front of the thighs, shin, top of the foot and toes, and then allow the whole body to drop, completely relaxed. Pay special attention to the tension points, locate them and work on them to release their strain. Use whatever speaks to you, visualisation, breathing, speaking, stretching – but release the tension!
• Sit up and bend forward, keep the knees straight, just wave hello to the toes, you don’t have to touch them, this is not a yoga exercise! Starting at the base of the skull, attend in succession to the stretching of the back muscles of the neck, shoulders, ribs, waist, hips, thighs, calves and soles of the feet. There must be no effort or contraction, take it very easily. Play with the 6 kilos of your head, stretch up and slowly allow the head to carry the spine forward, paying attention to the tension areas (generally shoulders, lower back, hamstrings). Don’t go into the pain zone! Rest on your back and relax the whole body.There is only one rule in all this. No tension! You know where it lies and can let it go if you want but you must tell it to.This process requires extreme attention as it promotes the most essential factor of improved subjective activity: increased awareness. With this same end of awareness in view, it is a good idea to rest between each step and register the effects.The elimination of the first two causes of contraction, namely, conscious-physical and unconscious-physical contraction, produces the following results:a) reduction of expenditure of energy on objective processes followed by proportional increase in the expenditure of energy on subjective processes,b) reduction of awareness of objective processes as an effect followed by proportional increase in awareness of subjective processes, resulting in new possibilities for conscious control,c) a loss of awareness of the outside “relatives”, time and space, and a proportional gain of awareness of the inside,d) a deep sense of physical rest and, with it, a sense no less deep, intense physical work within.When you have finished the stretching, allow a few minutes to recharge your biomagnetic field. Regardless of the polarity in the hands, just interlace your fingers. The polarities will be joined, negative and positive. Now, your feet. People with right-handed positive polarity, put your left foot over the right ankle. Right over left ankle for left-handed positive polarity. You will find out after five minutes if you made the wrong choice! You will feel enervated, so change foot.With hands and feet joined, sitting at your desk, on the bus, lying down, wherever, you have closed the biomagnetic loop of the body’s field and are recharging. Why do that? The current of the blood’s movement through the veins and the energy through the meridians result in an electric charge, measured in millivolts. 10mV and you are at death’s door, at 70 mV – and you will not get higher – you are fighting fit. Most people come in at 25mV, which is weak and the immune system is probably struggling.No one, to my knowledge, has ever pointed out that this is just what you are doing when sitting cross-legged in meditation, one hand in the other, but no matter. One often sees old people in this position, maybe their bodies react instinctively.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

The FDV (Freeland Double Vortex)

The FDV is a fresh solution to the invisible effects of radiation. Everything we know, as in see, hear, feel, touch and smell, is a question of frequency. Like light, the signal that lets you talk on a mobile phone is a frequency in the electromagnetic spectrum.
When we analyse something, subjecting it to a scrutiny beyond its normal environment, we remove it from its context and separate it from what we are trying to understand, modern physics proves this. More than ever, in today’s world:

▶️  Research needs financing

▶️  Financiers need a return on investment

▶️  Investors will opt for the easiest return in the shortest possible term

▶️  Any product outside the current paradigm is consequently, naturally discarded.

The domain of energy and its endless manifestations in Nature no longer interest the supremacist human. We have conquered the world! What more do we need now that we have transport, communications, nutrition and pharmaceuticals?

Having said that, I have been pressured for “scientific” explanation and it struck me that the most suitable way – for me – would be to tell the story of its development.

In the beginning… Interest was piqued some years ago when I started using a mobile phone EMF “neutralizer” acquired via a Polish colleague.

The device, when attached to the mobile phone, relieved the “hot ear” and headache which a friend suffered from when using the phone for more than twenty minutes, that was sufficient to hold my focus, but there was clearly some experimenting and investigating to do in order to understand the whys and wherefores because no one could tell me how this was possible.

The Polish manufacturer spoke enough English to tell me that fundamentally he did not know but was using a technique his father had mysteriously discovered using two different metals.

My experience as a French-English translator for twenty-five years specialising in state-of-the-art technologies including telecommunications working as a freelance had prepared and educated me in a wide range of disciplines relating to physical phenomena.

It is accepted scientific knowledge that when a flux of electromagnetic radiation passes through a substance it will either be absorbed or transmitted, resulting in a transition in the electron energy levels of the molecule, as a result potentially altering its configuration and the surroundings, although the latter is generally only considered when something unusual happens.

The absorption or transmission primarily depends on the radiation frequency and the structure of the molecules encountered, I would add that structure alone presents a vast scope of possibilities in itself.

My first question was how can a combination of metals, of which the device in question is made of, accomplish that?

Obviously in theory a molecule has to have an oscillating electric field to interact with the radiation and those oscillations must be at the same rate, this is known as frequency matching. By generating an oscillating electric field or a change in the dipole moment the radiation of that frequency can be absorbed, because the dipole moment oscillates at the frequency of the vibration, or so science would have it.

If the combination of metals was causing the frequency matching and so somehow causing absorption or transmission – no tests have ever been run to investigate the exact effect – so it could be either, it was a natural step to consider the effect over time on the composition of the metals.

This question of effect over time is clearly manifest in the phenomenon of cavitation, a frequent problem arising in steam generators in nuclear power plants and on ship’s propellers – when you alter the configuration of something there is a good chance that at some stage the original material integrity will be compromised, impacting the purpose which is no longer achieved or modified to the extent that problems arise.

Having tested a large number of the “phone” devices available on the market and examined the technology behind them, my understanding of the claim to “neutralize” was challenged. Perhaps it is a question of terminology and as always, the words and symbols we use can lead to confusion. The upshot was “I don’t know!”, there are no references, few parameters, with an increasingly changing environment gradually being filled with more and more electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from a variety of sources making the task complex.

One thing was clear in my mind, however, all the operational substances being employed in the host of devices on the “neutralizer” market, whether crystals, metals or rare earths, would at some stage be subject to the time factor and the potential subsequent inability to provide frequency matching, which I believe is the key to all these solutions functioning. A few manufacturers of devices on the market warn of this phenomenon, calling it “saturation” and even offer to recharge the device if and when it happens.

But how does one know when it has happened?

There is no warning that the device has stopped working and has perhaps become useless, even dangerous as it might have an adverse frequency-concentration or some such effect. That fact struck me as being vital if a lasting solution, if such is possible, was to be found.

Form vs Material

There then followed a laborious and slow process of trial and error which led me to investigating form rather than any other expedient. This was new territory because although dealing with well-defined technologies that had been developed since the 1930s and the time of radar’s application during the second world war, there had been very little research made on the human interaction with EMR, or it was not being published as the dangers are definitely not to the honour of the now-burgeoning mobile phone industry.

As can be imagined when working with form or shape there were quite a few false leads concerning dimensions, potential materials and assembly methods.

Initially I was using silk thread because of its remarkable physical qualities before I found that printed form works as well. There was also some intense discomfort in the actual manufacturing of the earlier models of the prototypes I made because the energetic build-up caused dizziness and severe headache as soon as there was more than one device at a time on my desk.

It rapidly and concurrently became apparent that the appropriate solution lay in the individual approach, in other words, there is a need to work on the human metabolism rather than trying to alter any frequency effects in the environment, let alone the phone itself, which I doubt is possible without serious equipment.

Following in the steps of numerous other observers of nature and pioneers in diverse arts and sciences, as I had been doing for some years, the eternal fact slowly dawned on me that shape and form in Nature are the fundamental archetypes of creation, describing the self-organizing forces that govern and define our visible world, at least as we perceive it with our senses.

Every pattern has the ability to generate or reproduce certain proportional systems, to which we contemporary humans then give a mathematical interpretation with a name that, of course, potentially restricts the movement and limits our perception to the part defined. We miss an essential point because all the while our interpretation is a static observation – because it must be repeatable for approval – but between times the environment has moved on and us with it.

Convinced of the reality that shape indicates how energy is compressed and organized, there must be a relation among the factors that create form. Energies are/can be controlled, specified and modified due to the effects of movement along a given path taken by the energy itself. One only has to stand in the vicinity of a sky-scraper to realize that the wind current follows an invisible pattern determined, in part, by the straight lines presented by the walls and axes of possible flow.

Our reasoning ability, our knowledge base, our understanding of life are very personal. Generally they are very confused thanks to educational systems, hearsay and scientific discoveries which serve to stand the last discovery on its head.

Our understanding of life is naturally a question of belief and nothing more.

Does one give credit to science and the accepted paradigm?

Does one believe what your teachers and parents have told you?

Do you try and find out for yourself?

There will be a grain of truth in all, so one cannot say this is the right method and the other is wrong. We do that and get into trouble, we intuit that is not the best way of going about it and tolerance dawns.

So, by constant and tireless questioning of every single “fact” we risk getting a little closer to the truth, as it exists, which will still elude us if we insist on looking from the anthropomorphic standpoint instead of from an all-embracing consciousness which may gracefully, but not systematically, allow us an insight into what is happening. On this assumption and in the awareness that such insights will be subject to our very limited human intellect, I pressed ahead.

At a certain stage in this process of applied research and thanks to the research of obscure but remarkable experimenters such as Viktor Schauberger, Leon Eeman, Alfred Tomatis, Theodor Schwenk et al, I found that the vortex form has unique properties including a capacity when the movement of energy is directed through it, to generate an oscillating electric field or make a change in the dipole moment.

Some Physics and Biology

Vibrational modes and quantum transition are fascinating subjects but risk taking us off on a tangent, so suffice it to say that the human body being made up of a lot of water and a fair amount of protein, there is enough research material for generations but that cannot help us now.

There is a need to help ourselves because Nature is working overtime to keep it all together, or so it seems!

It was Helmholtz, a 19th century physician, who said that in a frictionless liquid, a vortex will not disappear, it will last.

The aether or the empty space which surrounds and permeates us is frictionless, not moving but allowing movement, a “fluid” with both a positive and negative electric charge. Such aether also enables a wave or particles of light to pass through it.

Some of the leads that I followed:

a)     Light has a centripetal (towards the centre) or positive electric charge but no centrifugal (away from the centre) or negative charge.

b)     Matter has a centrifugal or negative electric charge but no centripetal or positive charge.

c)     Inertia or absence of movement resists change, perhaps because it has reached a point of energetic stability, nevertheless its origin is in spin.

The vortex spins in a spiral but has no measurable axis of spin, which is normal, all of nature – including us humans – involves these vortices so we cannot create an instrument which would allow us to find an axis – in relation to what, so simply use the spiral and create spin!

Practice shows that the clockwise spiral is stronger energetically than the anti-clockwise movement. It is perhaps irrelevant whether it is centrifugal or centripetal, how can one determine one’s position, by what criteria? A clue to the answer lies in the function of light or electromagnetic frequency, especially when it encounters matter.

A centripetal vortex reduces friction because it contracts the radius of the passage of movement, resulting in acceleration, contraction, convergence, integration and quiet, compared with a centrifugal vortex which increases friction because it expands the radius of the passage of movement, resulting in deceleration, destruction, dissipation, divergence, disintegration and noise.

The use of a device which presents a double vortex form can reasonably be assumed to modify the movement of energy caused by the impact of electromagnetic frequencies, in view of early experimentation of scattering using vortical forms.

The effect on humans is demonstrated by the results of blood tests on people using the double vortex pattern which showed improved red blood cell separation and significant results in other testing protocols.

Extensive research into absorption and scattering in aero- and hydrodynamics as conducted throughout the world in the last sixty years to determine the interaction between types of waves and the surroundings led me to further refinement in the spiral shape that was originally indicated as being the right one.

I was initially using a small elephant tusk that a friend had given me to wind a specific length of silk thread into a precise pattern – well quite precise, before reversing the winding direction for the remaining half length and making a mirror spiral of opposing directions!

A copper cone of greater geometric precision then replaced the tusk. We know that geometric form in the shape of a vortex is instrumental in producing thrust by scattering waves as has been demonstrated repeatedly, especially in the development of the jet engine and subsequent integration into machines and devices using the venturi model, so there had to be something to explore there.

The capacity of EMR to penetrate a material and its intensity once beneath the surface was obviously a key factor but most scientific research has been conducted on metals and animal rather than human tissue and the emphasis is on the decay of electromagnetic waves inside the material.

Although radiation may be partially reflected from the surface, there is still an energy field that is transmitted once inside the surface. The depth of penetration in the human body depends on a variety of factors, including the force of the electromagnetic field, the frequency or frequencies, the resistance of skin and bone, the condition of the individual metabolism and its magnetic resistance (negative and positive ions in the blood), among numerous other factors.

The Evidence

As with the phenomenon of scattering, there is significant disagreement amongst the various theories as to what these fields do to the human metabolism and no conclusions are or can be drawn and that is probably explainable given the difficulty to identify precisely all the external influences at play and the practical impossibility to isolate their complex interaction.

We are in an age where older scientific theories are debunked by theories of probability! There is a lack of evidence to the possibility that form (in this case the double vortex) can modify the effects of electromagnetic frequency on a human, however, there is sixty years of research to support the idea that the vortex modifies energetic travel, so perhaps its impact.

Generally, there are inverse laws at work and this could well be a case in question! No claims to physiological, neurological effect are made with my FDV device, apart from the proven fact that blood analysis tests have demonstrated an improvement in red blood cell separation, probably caused by the vortex effect, and the absence of hot ear and headache.

This leaves a vast arena of unexplored territory, spread with the usual mines of derision, pseudo-science and the fine web of disinformation and deceit that has plagued the scene since the discovery of radar but has become a well and fiercely defended position on the part of the industry.

In the world of today where electricity, communications and turbulence are intensely prevalent except in the remotest of terrains, I would venture that it is impossible to determine the origins and intensities of the multitude of frequencies, vibrations and disruption we humans are subject to. When combined, as they are, with the constantly streaming cosmic influences, the overall impact is so great that it appears very difficult even in a secluded laboratory, protected by the most sophisticated shielding, to recognize individual electromagnetic, electric and magnetic fields.

This means that in all probability frequency recognition is random and measurement cannot be repeated. Identification with regard to source is constantly altered by surrounding influences and, therefore, cannot be coherently plotted. This is made exponentially more complicated due to the complexity of those waves, with electromagnetic wavelengths ranging as they do from around 0.01 nanometres at one end of the recognized spectrum to in excess of 100,000 kilometres at the other end.

Our planet has apparently been in its current frequency form for several million years. At some or several stage(s), thanks in part (and a large one at that) to those frequencies, life (in the singular) was able to develop into multiple forms. That environment allows nature to continue as we know it today.

While the World Health Organisation released a report in 2011 stating that there is a relation between brain tumour and using a phone for half an hour a day, the industry says it needs more time to find out if mobile phones are harmful to human health, there is no mention of the planet and the problems we are causing the environment. There would be little point debating that but so long as in vivo tests are not conducted on a much broader context than to-date or the results published, there can be little progress.

There have recently been several calls from the industry to end further investigation into the effects of EMR, so it is highly unlikely that further research will be forthcoming because it is the industry that has been financing EMR investigation for many years. Modern physics describes the mechanics of our world, not the formative forces at work nor their interaction with humans so what precedes is at the limits of science because the study of shape and form have been neglected in favour of the mechanical aspects as applied to centrifugal purposes.